켐프 KEMP 표면처리 기술 블로그

Innozinc·ELPANG·HiGANiC·G·SAVE의 적용 사례와 시험 근거, 도금 원가·내식성 개선을 위한 기술 자료

Reducing Repeat Repair Costs on Galvanized Steel: GSAVE and GPLUS Specifications

한국어로 읽기

Repeat repairs to galvanized structures incur costs for rust removal, recoating labor, access equipment, transport and work-zone control, in addition to coating materials. Cost-effective specification starts with selecting a coating system for the condition of the remaining zinc layer and distinguishing factory treatment before dispatch from application on site.

GSAVE is a repair coating that forms a protective zinc-flake layer. GPLUS is a transparent inorganic post-treatment that inhibits oxidation and dissolution of zinc-based surfaces. Distinguishing corrosion-protection restoration on deteriorated galvanized surfaces, supplementary protection of existing components and corrosion-resistance enhancement of new products provides the basis for selecting the coating and application process.

Select the coating system by surface condition and required function

Target surfaceRequired functionApplication
Corroded hot-dip galvanized surfaces or exposed steel substrateRestore the protective zinc layerGSAVE after rust removal and surface preparation
Existing components and fastened joints with a remaining zinc-based protective layerEnhance the corrosion resistance of the remaining layerGPLUS after surface preparation
New zinc-electroplated or hot-dip galvanized members and fastenersEnhance corrosion resistance before dispatchGPLUS post-treatment after zinc coating

Site assessment covers remaining zinc thickness (μm), the area affected by red rust (m²), exposed steel and adhesion of the existing coating. Where steel section loss has occurred, structural integrity is assessed first. Before applying GSAVE to a surface with an existing organic coating, that coating is removed to expose the galvanized surface or steel substrate.

Guardrail with brown corrosion before GSAVE application and a silver-gray surface after repair
Guardrail before and after on-site repair. Top: before repair. Bottom: after GSAVE application. Source: GSAVE product catalog, p. 2.

GSAVE: barrier protection combined with sacrificial anodic action

The plate-like zinc particles in GSAVE form an overlapping structure that obstructs the ingress of moisture, salts and other corrosive agents. At exposed steel, zinc provides electrochemical protection through sacrificial anodic action. Applications include deteriorated hot-dip galvanized structures, damaged galvanized areas, cut edges and welds.

Close-up of a deteriorated galvanized member and fastener before GSAVE on the left, and the silver-gray repaired surface on the right
Close-up of the galvanized surface and fastening area before and after repair. Left: before repair. Right: after GSAVE application. Source: GSAVE product catalog, p. 3.

The repair sequence is rust removal and degreasing → substrate preparation → GSAVE application → ambient-temperature curing → coating inspection. GSAVE also applies where part of the galvanized layer remains but corrosion has progressed to the point that restoration of corrosion protection is required. Dry film thickness (DFT), number of coats and curing conditions are controlled according to the formulation and application specification.

SST durations for standard and aerosol formulations

Product and substrate configurationSST duration
GSAVE standard formulation over hot-dip galvanizing3,000 h
GSAVE standard formulation on steel1,500 h
GSAVE aerosol over hot-dip galvanizing1,500 h
GSAVE aerosol on steel1,000 h
GSAVE product catalog, p. 3. Test specifications distinguish the standard formulation from the aerosol formulation.

Specimens coated with the standard GSAVE formulation over hot-dip galvanizing underwent salt spray testing to ASTM B117, with 5% NaCl at 35°C. After 3,000 hours, a small amount of white rust was observed, with no red rust or coating peeling. This result applies to the tested system comprising hot-dip galvanizing and a GSAVE topcoat.

40 cyclic corrosion test cycles on coated steel panels

GSAVE-coated steel panels remained free of red and white rust after 40 cyclic corrosion test (CCT) cycles under JIS H 8502:1999. Each cycle comprised the following four stages.

StageConditions and duration
Salt spray5 h
Drying70°C · 2 h
Humidity exposure50°C · 90% relative humidity · 3 h
Drying60°C · 2 h
Test conditions and observations: GSAVE product catalog, p. 4.

12 hours per cycle × 40 cycles = 480 hours of total exposure to repeated salt spray, drying and humidity stages. This evaluates coating performance under cyclic environmental exposure, separately from continuous salt spray testing (SST).

GPLUS: enhanced corrosion resistance for new and existing zinc-based surfaces

GPLUS is a transparent inorganic coating for zinc-plated, zinc-alloy-plated and zinc-based coated surfaces. It improves corrosion resistance by inhibiting zinc oxidation and dissolution and restricting the ingress of corrosive agents. It serves as a post-treatment for members and fasteners where the original appearance of the zinc coating is to be retained.

New-product post-treatment: 1,500-hour SST on hot-dip galvanized pipe

GPLUS post-treatment of newly zinc-electroplated or hot-dip galvanized products provides additional corrosion resistance before dispatch. Spray, dip-spin or roller application is selected according to component geometry and production volume. Key objectives include suppressing white rust and improving corrosion resistance in zinc-coated fasteners and members intended for coastal or chemical-industry environments.

Hot-dip galvanized pipe surfaces after 1,500 hours of ASTM B117 salt spray testing: GPLUS-treated on the left and untreated on the right
Pipe surface comparison with and without GPLUS post-treatment. Left: hot-dip galvanizing plus GPLUS. Right: hot-dip galvanizing alone. Both surfaces are shown after 1,500 hours of ASTM B117 salt spray testing. Source: GPLUS product catalog, p. 3.

After 1,500 hours of ASTM B117 salt spray testing, the GPLUS-treated and untreated hot-dip galvanized pipe surfaces show different corrosion progression. The left side received GPLUS post-treatment; the right side has hot-dip galvanizing alone. When assessing additional protection for new products, treated and untreated surfaces are compared within the same test.

Protection after mechanical damage: 480-hour SST following 2 tightening cycles

Salt spray comparison following 2 tightening cycles: untreated specimens on the left and GPLUS-treated specimens on the right; before testing above and after 480 hours below
ASTM B117 salt spray comparison over 480 hours following 2 tightening cycles. Left: untreated. Right: treated with GPLUS aerosol. Top: before salt spray testing. Bottom: after testing. Source: GPLUS product catalog, p. 4.

Zinc-electroplated, hot-dip galvanized and zinc-flake-coated (ZFC) bolts and nuts underwent 2 tightening cycles. GPLUS aerosol-treated and untreated groups were then compared through 480 hours of ASTM B117 salt spray testing. The treated group showed suppression of corrosion progression.

This test evaluates enhancement of corrosion resistance in zinc-based protective layers mechanically damaged during assembly. Where steel is exposed and the protective layer needs to be re-established, rust removal, surface preparation and GSAVE repair are performed first. A GPLUS topcoat is then applied where required by the supplementary protection specification.

Technical and economic assessment by area, labor and equipment input

Worker applying a repair coating to a steel structural member from an elevated work platform
On-site steelwork repair using an elevated work platform. Repeat work requires access equipment and labor as well as coating materials. Source: GSAVE product catalog, p. 2.

Direct costs for on-site repair extend beyond the unit price of the coating. For the same work scope, material consumption, preparation and application labor, and equipment operating days should be calculated separately.

C₀ = A × cₘ + H × cₕ + D × cₑ + Canc

Variables and unitsCost basis
A · cₘ
m² · KRW/m²
Application area · material cost per unit area
H · cₕ
person-hours · KRW/person-hour
Preparation, application and inspection labor · labor rate
D · cₑ
equipment-unit-days · KRW/equipment-unit-day
Equipment input · equipment rate
Canc
KRW
Separate costs such as transport, work-zone control, removal and reinstallation
C₀ is the direct cost of the specified work. Items already included in the quotation are not counted twice.

GSAVE: on-site repair that reduces the scope of removal, transport and reinstallation

Members that retain structural integrity and are suitable for on-site repair can have their corrosion protection restored in place. Compared with replacement or factory reprocessing, removal, transport and reinstallation costs are major cost-difference items. GSAVE application costs include rust removal, degreasing, removal of existing coatings where necessary, application and inspection labor. Ambient-temperature curing allows the work to be organized without separate heat-curing equipment.

For localized damage, calculate the actual repair area A and the scope of edge preparation. For widespread deterioration, assess the total application area and surface-preparation productivity. Damage distribution and working height affect H and D even on the same structure, so both KRW/m² and total application cost should be compared.

GPLUS: the cost structure of field protection and factory post-treatment

On existing galvanized components, incorporating GPLUS application into scheduled inspection, assembly or maintenance can reduce duplicate site visits and equipment mobilization. Quotations should distinguish labor already included in the planned work from the additional labor required for application, curing and inspection.

For new products, post-treatment cost per component = total batch material, labor, equipment and inspection costs ÷ number of accepted components. Compare alternatives for the same component, volume and required corrosion resistance, and assess the access-equipment and work-zone-control costs of repairs after installation separately. Factory post-treatment provides the process advantage of protecting surfaces before dispatch that will be difficult to access after installation.

If repeat repairs are required, cumulative direct cost = initial application cost C₀ + the sum of direct costs for each subsequent repair. Each repair includes the required coating removal, repeat surface preparation, recoating and site remobilization. Defining the GSAVE repair scope and timing of GPLUS post-treatment in advance aims to reduce unnecessary repetition of work and site mobilization.

Specify the application process for the component and zinc coating

Send component photographs, the existing zinc-coating and coating-system specifications, the service environment, and application area (m²) or quantity (units) to request an application assessment from KEMP. For deteriorated structures, the assessment considers the remaining zinc layer and surface-preparation scope. For new products, it considers the required corrosion resistance and production process. These define the GSAVE or GPLUS application scope and the basis for cost estimation.

Comments

답글 남기기

켐프 KEMP 표면처리 기술 블로그에서 더 알아보기

지금 구독하여 계속 읽고 전체 아카이브에 액세스하세요.

계속 읽기